4 posts
Foods differ enormously in measurable harm — beef emits about 113 times what peas do per unit of protein. But the diets people moralise are organised around purity and disgust, not around that ranking, and the two orderings barely overlap.
'How much of success is luck' is unanswerable as posed. 'How much is explained by circumstances nobody chose' is a regression, and it has been run. Country of residence alone accounts for nearly three-quarters of the variation in individual incomes across the world.
The oldest argument in human rights is whether universal standards can be applied to particular cultures. Egypt is the case where we can check. Prohibition plus medical authority did not end the practice — it relocated it, and gave it a safety justification it did not have before.
We treat empathy as the foundation of ethics — the more you feel someone's pain, the better you'll act. In the lab, inducing empathy makes people violate their own stated principles of fairness. The problem isn't that empathy is bad. It's that it was never a moral faculty.
